In the meantime this is one of his posts that I enjoyed.
Don
The Bible is a wikistory – a mashup of stories
by Michael Novelli | August 18 2008 11:15 PM
It’d be nice if the Bible read like a novel from cover to cover. But it’s not a novel. It’s a series of books that have been grouped together—and many of them are out of chronological order.
In technological terminology, a mashup is a Web application that combines data from more than one source into a single integrated tool. The Bible is like this—a mashup of different writings from different authors inspired to tell the unified Story of God and his love for people.
In a recent talk, author Scot McKnight suggested we look at the Bible as a “Wikistory,” in which there is “ongoing reworking of the biblical story by new authors who each tell the story in their own way.” McKnight continued, “None [of the books of the Bible] is exhaustive, comprehensive or absolute...they are different stories of THE Story. We don’t have to harmonize them or try to reconcile them. They’re just doing their own versions of the Story, and each has a place in the larger picture.”
Let’s face it—the Bible is often difficult to read and to teach. We’ve got our work cut out for us if we wish to give our students a sense of its overarching story. That’s why storying is the best way I’ve found to give people, young and old alike, a Bible overview with context to all future Bible learning.
(Excerpted from my forthcoming book, Shaped by the Story)
1 comment:
Dear Don
I am glad your spiritual longings were validated. For more validation of them and an exploration of what your own longings may well be pointing to read John Drane's book, The McDonaldization of the church (2000), Darton Longman & Todd, London, which has so clearly extended my own understandings that I am going to buy it. By it and by all the practical examples we were immersed in through our course with Steve we may be able to break the mould of religious forms that deny the power of God (cf. 2 Tim 3:5).
Post a Comment